Use of vacuum systems for early implant-associated infection after decompression and stabilization surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis

نویسندگان

چکیده

Objective. To analyze the results of treatment patients with implant-associated surgical site infection after decompression and stabilization surgery performed for lumbar spinal stenosis. Material Methods. Results 43 early (up to 90 days operation) suppuration wound operations stenosis were analyzed. Results. A total 4033 implantation systems from 2015 2019. There (1.06 %) cases installed instrumentation. Out them seven (16.27 superficial 36 (83.78 – deep. In all cases, revision, debridement installation a vacuum assisted closure (VAC-dressing) performed. The was accompanied by single VAC-dressing before closure, in deep 2 8 (on average 4.10 ± 1.73) VAC-dressings changed. Wound healing achieved within 14–55 (average 29.10 10.06) days. Timely diagnosis complication application negative pressure therapy allowed arresting inflammatory process preserving implants follow-up period 12 months. Conclusion. case development wound, patient needs an urgent sanitizing operation. Negative is effective safe way relieve this complication. This method combined etiotropic antibiotic makes it possible quickly cleanse heal while implanted

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Micro Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Spinal stenosis was described, for the first time, as one of the causes of neural compression by Bailey and Casamajor (1) in 1911. Later, in 1954, it was described by Verbiest (2) as the typical clinical presentation of bilateral neurogenic claudication, which is provoked by prolonged standing and lower back extension and relieved by sitting and flexing the lumbar spine. Degenerative lumbar spi...

متن کامل

Bone regrowth after surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

We reviewed 40 patients treated surgically for lumbar stenosis at an average time of 8.6 years after operation. In 32, total laminectomy had been performed and in eight bilateral laminotomy, both at one or more levels. Of the 16 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis, ten had had a concomitant spinal fusion. Patients were assigned to one of four groups according to the amount of bone regr...

متن کامل

Minimal Invasive Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common condition in elderly patients and may lead to progressive back and leg pain, muscular weakness, sensory disturbance, and/or problems with ambulation. Multiple studies suggest that surgical decompression is an effective therapy for patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis. Although traditional lumbar decompression is a time-honored procedure, minimally invasiv...

متن کامل

Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression for Spinal Stenosis

Over 1.2 million patients are diagnosed with, and in active treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) at any given time. Typically, these patients experience discomfort while walking or standing, for any length of time. The LSS treatment algorithm contains a gap of under-treated patients between epidural steroid injections (ESI) and open surgery. With the introduction of a minimally invasive l...

متن کامل

Reliability and Validity of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for Iranian Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Background: The purpose of this study was validation of the Persian translation of the Swiss Spinal StenosisQuestionnaire in order to be used by Iranian researchers.Methods: A total of 104 patients with spinal stenosis diagnosis, who were candidates for operative treatment wereentered into the study. The patients completed the translated questionnaire in the 1st and the 7th days of admissionand...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: ???????? ????????????

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2077-7566', '2412-9461']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2021.3.53-60